Conservation

Since our founding in 1965, Flycasters has always had very active fishery conservation activities.   We have successfully managed and funded a number significant local fisheries restoration projects.  Working though the Northern California Council of the Federation of Fly fishers (NCCFFF). we have projected our voice to statewide and national issues of concern for all species of fish and all classes of waters.  By providing our membership the vehicle to work their way up through the ranks of the FFF, Flycasters have assumed FFF committee, directorship, and officer positions that have resulted in our participation in the available broad coalitions with all the others fishery conservation groups in areas such as:  Bay-Delta IssuesState Water Resources, HydropowerGolden Trout Restoration, and more.

 

 After many years of surveying south bay fisheries, the FFF and San Jose Flycasters located a high dam on the important Little Arthur Creek tributary of the Pajaro River in Gilroy that predated the 1924 California Water Code. There were no minimum flow requirements and the dam was silted in, completely blocking steelhead migration. Under the leadership of one of our members, the late Fred Houwink, we found that the very cooperative ranch owner, Edward Pickells, had attempted to build fishways in the canyon only to have them destroyed twice by flood-stage flows.  Mr. Pickells had a flashboard portal in the dam that he opened in winter to flush out accumulated rubbish and was very receptive to our project.

Our involvement with the Federation of Fly Fishers thorough Marty Seldon, who then the FFF Conservation Vice President, showed us the potential of the Alaska Steep-Pass Fish Ladder.  CDF&G engineers and biologists visited the site and were also very enthusiastic.  Fred and another club member, Jerry Hensley, who became the formal project contractor used the data, surveyed the site, and then designed a four-section, forty-foot long ladder system.  With agency participation and agreement, a formal proposal was later made to the CDF&G for Bosco-Keene funds that resulted in a grant of $31,500 for the project.

The project came to fruition in the summer of 1986.  There were numbers of vendors, our contractor, and club volunteers providing most of the labor.  About 500 tons of riprap rock were purchased and placed in the canyon to form a 40-foot ramp up to the portal of the dam, 10 foot above the streambed.  Flycaster’s work teams muscled the riprap into a trough for the fishway sections that were fabricated in Gilroy.  Each section had a two-foot wide bottom and side sections with complex interior welded baffle plates.  Dozens of angle-iron straps braced the open top and hundreds of 1/2x1 inch bolts held them all together. The bulldozer and shovel crane used to handle the riprap were inadequate to handle the fishway and a 45-ton crane was brought in to lift the fishway and reach out 75 feet to lower it into the riprap trough.  A two-foot high concrete weir was built across the end of the ledge with openings for the fishway and rubbish exhaust port.   The last construction phase of the project pumped 32 cubic yards of concrete to consolidate the rip-rap and tie it all together with reinforcing bars set in holes drilled in the sheer canyon wall.  CDF&G monitored all phases of construction and we passed every inspection with flying colors.

The photos below show the dam prior to construction of the fish ladder, one of construction in progress, and one from the top of the dam looking down the creek after completion.

LittleArthurCreekFishLadderLittleArthurCreekFishLadder2

LittleArthurCreekFishLadder3

For over 15 years our Little Arthur Creek project facilitated steelhead migration and the run increased.  The Club started working with Santa Clara Valley Water District to plan the installation of a large gate valve to replace the flashboard dam system.  However, as the result of a change in ranch ownership we were suddenly faced with a hostile landowner that tried to prevent access to the project.  Agency personnel and our conservation partners kept track of what was happening on the ranch but it went badly for our steelhead.

 In 2007, the dam owner, Luke Brugnara left the flashboards in place in the portal of the dam blocking flow to the fish ladder between January and April.  The habitat above the dam is critical to the survival of the South-Central California Coast steelhead, which are found in Little Arthur Creek and are listed as threatened on the federal Endangered Species list. An investigation by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G) found numerous trapped adult steelhead downstream that could not migrate upstream to suitable spawning habitat.  When the rescue team arrived to move the steelhead upstream, the steelhead were gone and investigators found evidence of poaching. In a search of Brugnara’s home, enforcement officials found steelhead in his freezer.  Charges were then filed.  Brugnara initially pleaded not guilt, but prior to the trial scheduled for January 25, 2010, Brugnara pleaded guilty to the poaching charges and two counts of making false statements in the course of an investigation.

 On May 26, 2010 Luke Brugnara, 46, Little Arthur Creek property owner was sentenced to 15 months in prison for the poaching of steelhead from below the dam on the creek. Steelhead have been listed as a threatened species in the Pajaro River watershed since 1977. Prosecutors said the case is the first federal criminal case in the country regarding the illegal taking of steelhead by blocking access to a stream. Brugnara who is also the owner of a San Francisco real estate firm,  was also found guilty of income taxes evasion, fined about 1.5 million dollars, and sentenced to two and one half years in prison for this offense.

 Flycasters is continuing to monitor the facility and is working with our conservation partners to develop future plans.  Our project was completely successful and is still operational.

In a recent conversation with Jonathan Ambrose, NOAA Biologist, we learned that a Hydrologist with Trout Unlimited is undertaking a new pilot project to develop water storage systems for winter run off water for residents and vineyard owners who presently have water rights on the upper reaches of Little Arthur Creek.  Little Arthur Creek is one of four sights along creeks in the Bay Area chosen for such a project.  Reducing the appropriation of water from the creek will enhance the creek flow for a longer period of time and provide more water for the young steelhead.

Last Updated (Saturday, 19 June 2010 10:40)

 

I’ve always wondered about fish mortality when catch and release is practiced.  I have seen mortality numbers ranging from a few percent to over 40%, and I worry about playing the fish too long.  I’ve also wondered about the effectiveness of barbless hooks.  Do they really help and are they worth the trouble?  I am always forgetting to crimp down the barb before casting the fly. 

I got some interesting information the other evening on these issues as I was reading Robert Behnke’s wonderful collection of articles from Trout Magazine.  Dr. Behnke, in his essay “Putting Them Back Alive” reported on some studies that were carried out  in 1964-65 by aquatic biologist Leo Marnell at Yellowstone Lake as part of his Ph. D. research.  This is perhaps the most comprehensive research ever carried out on hooking mortality of wild trout. 

In this study, many hundreds of Yellowstone cutthroat were caught using various hooks and lure types and then held for 10 or 30 days to document mortality.  Some of the results surprised me.  With all factors constant except hook and lure type, 3 of 75 (4%) of trout died after release from barbed flies, 2 of 60 (3.3%) died after being hooked with barbless flies, 3 of 113 (2.7%) on barbed treble hooks (spoon lures) and 6 of 100 (6%) on barbless treble hooks.  Statistical analysis of this data shows no significant difference between the different hook types; the differences are explained by random chance. 

A significant difference in mortality did occur with fish caught on trolled worms and released.  In this case, out of 161 fish caught, 78 (48%) died after release.  If the trout did not swallow the bait, only 8% died, while 73% died if the bait was swallowed. 

A stress test was also done.  For fish caught on a treble hook, 4 of 100 died after landing quickly, 6 of 100 died after playing for 5 minutes and 5 of 100 died after 10 minutes of playing.  So, again, there was no difference among groups that experienced different levels of exhaustion. 

The cause of mortality was detailed.  Marnell found that of the 33 deaths out of 652 trout caught on artificial flies and lures, 30 were due to the hooks causing bleeding, usually from the gills.  Only 3 deaths were from unknown causes, which might suggest lethal stress. 

Temperature is  a  much more serious concern in mortality of released trout.  A study was carried out in Heenan Lake.  Fish were caught on artificial lures during early June, mid-July and September.  Released fish were held in live boxes for four days to determine mortality.  In June and September (with water temperature ranging from 50-600 F), 1.3% of the fish died.  During the July trial, when water temperature was near 700 F, 48.5% of the fish died.  Interestingly, the highest mortality (55%) occurred with a single barbless hook.  When I was recently fishing the Williamson River, our guide, Marlon Rampy mentioned that trout that are caught in Klamath Lake are usually holding in cold areas near subterranean springs.  When they are hooked and played near the surface in the warm summertime water, their chances of survival are poor due to the stress of the warm water environment. 

This article was very interesting and answered a lot of the questions that I have been asking myself since I took up fly fishing.  I have caught a lot of fish in the past on spoons with treble hooks and always released them.  I am comforted now to know that their survival rate was just as good as the fish I catch now on tiny flies.  Maybe we should review our contempt for “hardware bubbas” with their spoons and nasty looking treble hooks.  As long as they release the fish, it looks like they are doing no more harm than we are. 

Mike Brinkley

Last Updated (Friday, 19 February 2010 13:34)

 

Jan 22, 2010

By Jonathan Partridge GIlroy Dispatch

  

A jury trial will begin Monday for a San Francisco real estate developer who is charged with damming Little Arthur Creek and poaching a threatened species of steelhead trout in 2007.

Luke Brugnara faces four counts of "taking" the trout and two counts of making a false statement in the course of an investigation after he was indicted by a federal grand jury in April 2008. He has pled not guilty to all charges. This is the first federal criminal case in the country charging an individual and corporation with the poaching of steelhead by blocking an upstream habitat. The federal government contends that Brugnara intentionally blocked the flow of Little Arthur Creek, an important watershed for steelhead, for at least three months between January and April 2007. Regulators say that the habitat above the dam is critical to the survival of the South-Central California Coast steelhead, which are found in Little Arthur Creek and are listed as threatened on the federal Endangered Species list.  

The charges against Brugnara come as a result of an investigation by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the California Department of Fish and Game.  State and federal investigators said they found numerous trapped adult steelhead downstream of the dam that could not migrate upstream to a suitable spawning habitat. When a rescue team arrived to move the steelhead upstream, investigators said the steelhead were gone and they found evidence of poaching. 

The trial will begin at 9 a.m. Monday at the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California in San Francisco. It is expected to last five to seven days. Judge Maxine M. Chesney will preside over the trial.  

Flycasters, under the leadership of the Conservation Committee built a fishladder on this property many years ago to provide access for steelhead to this upstream watershed many years ago.  A short history of this project summarized by Marty Seldon follows.

Flycasters Little Arthur Creek Fish Ladder

Marty Seldon

 

After many years of surveying south bay fisheries the FFF and San Jose Flycasters located a high dam on the important Little Arthur Creek tributary of the Pajaro River in Gilroy that predated the 1924 California Water Code. There were no minimum flow requirements and the dam was silted in, completely blocking steelhead migration. Under the leadership of the late great Fred Houwink in the 1980’s we found that the very cooperative ranch owner, Edward Pickells, had attempted to build fishways in the canyon only to have them destroyed twice by flood-stage flows.  Mr. Pickells had a flash board portal in the dam that he opened in winter to flush out accumulated rubbish.

 

My involvement with the FFF turned me on to the potential of the Alaska Steep-Pass Fish Ladder.  DF&G engineers and biologists visited the site and were also enthusiastic.  Fred and our member-contractor Jerry Hensley used the data, surveyed the site, and then designed a four-section, forty foot long ladder system.  With agency participation and agreement, a formal proposal was later made to the CDF&G for Bosco-Keene funds that resulted in a grant of $31,500 for the project.

 

Then project was complex with a number of vendors, our contractor, and club volunteer labor.  500 tons of rip-rap rock were purchased and placed in the canyon to form a 40 foot ramp up to the portal of the dam. 10 foot above streambed.  Flycaster’s work teams muscled the rip-rap into a trough for the fishway sections that were fabricated in Gilroy.  Each section had a two-foot wide bottom and side sections with complex interior welded baffle plates.  Dozens of angle-iron straps braced the open top and hundreds of 1/2x1 inch bolts held them all together. The bulldozer and shovel crane used to handle the rip-rap were inadequate to handle the fishway and a 45-ton crane was brought in to lift the fishway and reach out 75 feet to lower it into the rip-rap trough.  A two-foot high concrete weir was built across the end of the ledge with openings for the fishway and a rubbish exhaust port.   The last construction phase of the project pumped 32 cubic yards of concrete to consolidate the rip-rap and tie it all together with reinforcing bars set in holes drilled in the sheer canyon wall.  CDF&G monitored all phases of construction and we passed every inspection with flying colors.

 

The bottom line is that this very successful project was able to open 15 miles of good steelhead habitat.  Unfortunately, the ranch was later sold and the current landowner, Brugnara, has been less than enthusiastic about even allowing access.  Our original project design included a subsequent modification that would replace the flash board dam with a large gate valve to eliminate the need the remove and replace the large timbers.  We had obtained participation from the Santa Clara County Flood Control and Water District to compete this last phase of the project but have been stymied by the lack of cooperation by the landowner.   We will be following the upcoming trial closely and hope to use this event to reopen the issue of replacing the flashboard dam.


 



 


Last Updated (Sunday, 24 January 2010 21:53)

 

 

Serious fly fishermen may remember 2007 as the year that the invasive species known as "rock snot" turned into a national problem. For at a least decade, nasty carpets of this algae have been fouling up pristine fishing streams in the western United States. Then, last summer, it turned up in fishing streams in several eastern states.

Angler Paul Doscher of New Hampshire says it's useless to cast fishing lines into these sometimes giant blooms.

"You try to reel it back in, and you end up with a giant gooey cottony wad (on your hook)," he said. "There is nothing like that that I have experienced. It makes streams essentially unfishable."rock snot

 

          Isolated Nuisance to Uncontrollable Monster

Twenty years ago, a mild version of the one-celled diatom that pumps out rock-snot blooms was found only in isolated mountain streams in western Canada. But in the 1980s, these blooms started getting larger and spreading into other streams.

"Something changed the diatoms in ways that made them more aggressive," said researcher Andrea Kirkwood of the University of Calgary. She says the change may have taken place when a European version of the rock snot diatom was accidentally brought to Canada. Kirkwood says it's also possible that the native version of this algae evolved in ways that created much more massive and more frequent blooms.

 

rock snot 2  What's certain is that by the early 1990s, massive rock snot blooms were fouling cold, clear rocky mountain streams in    western states such as Idaho, Wyoming and Colorado. Infestations sometimes stretched from bank to bank and covered several miles. Once the blooms appeared, it was impossible to make them go away.

 East Coast Invasion

 Rock snot seemed to be a strictly western problem until this past June, when a massive bloom appeared on the New Hampshire side of the Connecticut River. Before the summer, slimy carpets had fouled pristine fishing streams in New York, Vermont, Tennessee, Missouri and Virginia.

 Anglers like Paul Doscher say it's now clear that fishermen who don't clean and dry their boots and fishing rods have helped spread these nasty blooms.

"The reality is that anglers and recreationists travel worldwide now to do what they do," he said. "When they travel they bring their equipment with them. Some of us don't sanitize that equipment properly when we're done fishing."

Doscher says he has no doubt that this is how the rock snot blooms got spread around the country. He also suspects that sloppy fishermen helped carry rock snot diatoms to streams on the south island of New Zealand.

Officials in New England have been posting signs near fishing streams that urge visiting anglers to clean and dry their gear.

Story published by National Public Radio (NPR).  Rock Snot Hitches Ride on Fishing Gear

 

 

What is the New Zealand Mudsnail?

New Zealand Mudsnails are tiny INVASIVE snails that have now been found in certain creeks in the Santa Monica Mountains area.

They may be small, but don't be fooled! In large numbers, these small snails can completely cover a stream bed and wreak havoc on local stream ecosystems. Introduced from New Zealand to the Western United States in the 1980s, New Zealand Mudsnails have already invaded many Western rivers in California, Idaho, Montana and Wyoming including Yellowstone National Park. They have now been found in three streams in the Santa Monica Mountains.

Local and state agencies and environmental organizations are now enlisting the help of local hikers, horseriders, anglers, and others who use the creek, in preventing the spread of the New Zealand Mudsnail waterways in Southern California.

Photo: D. McKinney, with thanks to www.gazette.com

New Zealand Mudsnails on a wading boot. Mud snails hitch hike on gear such as boots, waders, bike tires and even pets. "These mudsnails behave rather differently as snails go... They are almost aggressive in the way they motor around and seek new things. If you are walking around in a stream, these snails are going to be checking out your feet. And if you stand in one place very long, some of them are going to come onboard." - Pete Walker, Colorado Division of Wildlife Senior Fish Pathologist (from McKinney, Dennis. "Destructive Mudsnails Found." The Gazette. 4 Apr. 2005)

Back to top

What are invasive species?

In a day and age of global trade and international travel, it is not surprising that plants and animals are also traveling by hitching a ride. Today, you can find Japanese oysters in Ensenada, Mexico, or in your backyard! However, some non-native plants and animals get out of control-when they reproduce very rapidly and crowd out other, native species, they are considered INVASIVE. Every year, 1.3 BILLION dollars are spent in the United States to battle invaders.

In fact, half of all endangered species in the United States are being threatened by invasives who eat them, eat their food, crowd them out, and destroy their natural habitats.

Photo: R. Draheim, with thanks to Center for Lakes and Reservoirs

New Zealand Mudsnails on a small rock, with penny for size comparison. Mudsnails create dense colonies-often 100,000 mudsnails can be found in an area the size of a large kitchen sink. "Where they have been found, they make up a large proportion of the living material that's in the ecosystem. But they are a dead-end, in terms of the food chain. They consume, but can't be consumed. They can out-compete and reduce the number of native aquatic invertebrates that fish and amphibians rely on for food. This reduction in food supply can disrupt the entire food web with drastic consequences." - Marc Abrahamson, Heal the Bay

Back to top

What makes the Mudsnail invasive? Why is it a problem?

In some ways, the New Zealand Mud-snail is the perfect invader. Mud-snails reproduce parthenogenetically-that is, by cloning themselves. It only takes a SINGLE snail to produce an invasion. In fact, a single snail can result in a colony of more than 40 million snails in just one year! New Zealand Mud Snails can completely cover a streambed, crowding out the native aquatic insects that provide food for native creek animals, including local endangered species like steelhead, tidewater goby, and the red-legged frog.

Photo: Miwa Tamanaha

Located just 25 miles from downtown Los Angeles, Malibu Creek flows through the Santa Monica Mountains to Malibu Lagoon, offering residents and visitors opportunities for hiking, fishing, bird watching and horseback riding. “These creeks and streams are incredibly sensitive systems. Anything that messes up that balance can have a grave impact. Changes we, as humans, create in the system are not always easy to change back. We should recognize that the more we alter the system, the more difficult it is to turn the clock back.” –Gary Busteed, National Park Service

Back to top

That sounds bad. What can I do?

Well, there is good news and bad news. Unfortunately, once a creek or stream has been invaded by mud-snails, the invasion is irreversible. There is no known way to eradicate mud-snails once they have been found in a water body.

The good news is that there is A LOT we can do to prevent mud snail invasions. And the things we do to prevent mud snail invasions will also help protect our local lakes and streams from other kinds of dangerous invaders—other invasive plants and aquatic animals that can also spread from place to place. While mud snails have been found in certain portions of Malibu Creek and Lake Piru, there are many of other places where we do not have mudsnails, and hopefully never will!

Remember, mud snails are tiny. They can be as small as a grain of sand, and only get up to 1/8 of an inch long. As you go from place to place, these tiny hitchhikers can easily attach to your wet boots, clothing, sports gear, pets, horses, and bikes, and spread from one stream to another.

You can help protect our local creeks by NOT SPREADING the New Zealand Mud-snail.

  1. Follow the tips on the left when visiting streams and lakes in your area. Don’t carry mud snails from place to place.

  2. Learn more about mud snails and invasive species. Click here for more resources.

  3. Spread the word! If you have friends and family who visit streams and lakes in your area, tell them about the threat of New Zealand Mudsnails and other invasive species. Encourage them to do the right thing and stop the spread!

  4. Creeks with poor water quality and degraded habitat quality are MOST susceptible to invasions-by mudsnails and other aquatic invasive species. Simple actions-like picking up litter and pet waste-can go a long way towards protecting creeks and streams. Click here to find some easy things you can do to improve water quality in our watershed.

We are fortunate, in an area as highly urbanized as Southern California, to have natural areas with truly beautiful lakes and streams. These places are home to many important native creatures, such as the endangered Southern Steelhead Trout, Arroyo Chub, Western Pond Turtles, Pacific Tree Frog, California Newt, Arboreal Salamander, Western Toad. Let's protect our natural heritage sites! Prevent the spread of New Zealand Mud-snails and other invasive plants and animal

Story published by:  mudsnails.com

 
More Articles...